<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is eye-tracking useful?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sensorydrive.co.uk/2006/06/01/is-eye-tracking-really-useful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sensorydrive.co.uk/2006/06/01/is-eye-tracking-really-useful/</link>
	<description>IA, UX, ID, W3C, WAI and a whole pile of other incomprehensible acronyms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:51:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: More on the usefulness of eyetracking : Sensorydrive - Stuart Church&#8217;s blog about user experience</title>
		<link>http://www.sensorydrive.co.uk/2006/06/01/is-eye-tracking-really-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>More on the usefulness of eyetracking : Sensorydrive - Stuart Church&#8217;s blog about user experience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sensorydrive.co.uk/2006/06/01/is-eye-tracking-really-useful/#comment-558</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Hatscher&#8217;s critique of eyetracking a couple of weeks ago, it&#8217;s very interesting to see that Jared Spool also has reservations. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Hatscher&#8217;s critique of eyetracking a couple of weeks ago, it&#8217;s very interesting to see that Jared Spool also has reservations. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
